Watch this video that breaks down the contradictions in what AI leaders are actually saying versus what they claim AGI will do. The biggest red flag? They say AGI will do everything for you automatically, but then turn around and say only people with special expertise will become trillionaires. If AGI is truly general intelligence that handles everything, why would you need to be an expert to use it? And here's the kicker—they're talking about universal basic income (UBI) while also describing a future where some people become trillionaires from AGI profits. That math doesn't add up unless they're planning to keep most of the wealth for themselves. The video also digs into their claims about 'compute access' being the new American Dream, but the explanation cuts off right when it gets interesting. Worth watching to see where the narrative actually falls apart.
OpenAI is hosting a livestream event. Details about the specific announcements, product launches, or demonstrations will be revealed during the broadcast.
The last time OpenAI did an unannounced livestream, they dropped GPT-4 Turbo and changed pricing overnight
OpenAI is launching ChatGPT Images 2.0 with major upgrades to image generation capabilities. Watch the livestream announcement at https://openai.com/live/
OpenAI is positioning this as a direct competitor to established image generation tools, suggesting they're confident enough to challenge the current market leaders
Throughout 2025 the standard response to any complaint about an LLM was some version of "just wait 3-6 months, the next generation will handle this effortlessly." The argument was everywhere. Every limitation was temporary, every missing capability was a few iterations away, every autonomous agent demo was a preview of imminent reality. It's April 2026 now and worth checking how that held up. On r/ClaudeAI this week there's a long thread about Opus 4.7 where multiple users argue it's a regress
Someone actually tested Mistral Medium 3.5 on AMD's new Strix Halo chip, and the results are... not great. For a 48k-token prompt with 4k thinking tokens, it took about 2 hours just to get an answer about code architecture. Yeah, you read that right—two hours. The takeaway: if you want to run this locally on Strix Halo, queue it up before bed. The technical setup involved heavy optimization (Q5_K_XL quantization, GPU acceleration with -ngl 999, cache reuse), but even with all that tuning, it's still a crawl. Not exactly the "instant local AI" dream, but hey, at least it works.