往下拉回到首頁
聯邦法官裁定AI聊天無律師-委託人特權。一位執行長刪除的ChatGPT對話被復原並在法庭上用來對付他。同一天,另一位法官做出相反的裁定。

聯邦法官裁定AI聊天無律師-委託人特權。一位執行長刪除的ChatGPT對話被復原並在法庭上用來對付他。同一天,另一位法官做出相反的裁定。

A federal judge ruled AI chats have no attorney-client privilege. A CEO's deleted ChatGPT conversations were recovered and used against him in court. On the same day, a different judge ruled the opposite.

A federal judge ruled that your AI conversations can be seized and used against you in court — and deleting them doesn't help. **The Heppner case (February 2026):** - Former CEO Bradley Heppner used Claude to prep his fraud defense - Judge Jed Rakoff ordered him to surrender 31 AI-generated documents - Ruling: no attorney-client privilege exists "or could exist" between a user and an AI platform **The Krafton case:** - A CEO used ChatGPT to plan how to avoid paying promised earnout payment