Pull down to go back
Gemma 4 26B completely fabricated a code audit—here's the database proof
researchreddit

Gemma 4 26B completely fabricated a code audit—here's the database proof

Gemma 4 26B 整場程式碼稽核都是編出來的——資料庫有完整證據

I run Gemma 4 26B-A4B locally via Ollama as part of a custom self-hosted AI platform. The platform stores every model interaction in SQLite, including three columns most people never look at: content (the visible response), thinking (the model's chain-of-thought), and tool_events (every tool call and its result, with full input/output). I asked Gemma to audit a 2,045-line Python trading script. She had access to read_file and bash tools. Here's what the database actually shows happened—and it's not what the user saw.

Read original →

Keywords

Gemma 4 26Bhallucinationcode audittool usechain-of-thoughtforensic analysislocal deploymentOllama

Related Articles

Google's AI Development Tool Antigravity Has a Critical Flaw That Lets Hackers Run Commands Remotely
ResearchRead

Google's AI Development Tool Antigravity Has a Critical Flaw That Lets Hackers Run Commands Remotely

Security researchers at Pillar Security just revealed a serious vulnerability in Google's Antigravity AI agent development tool. Attackers can exploit a prompt injection weakness to bypass the sandbox protection and execute malicious commands from anywhere. The good news? Google's already patched it after being notified.

This isn't just about Google — any AI agent tool that processes external prompts could have the same sandbox-escaping weakness lurking underneath

RSS
AMD's AI Director Just Proved Claude Isn't Ready for Real Engineering Work
ResearchRead

AMD's AI Director Just Proved Claude Isn't Ready for Real Engineering Work

AMD's AI director analyzed 6,852 Claude Code sessions and found something alarming: Claude is getting worse at complex engineering tasks, not better. The data is brutal—thinking depth dropped 67%, the model stopped reading code before editing it (dropping from 6.6 reads to just 2.0), and it started blindly modifying files it never even looked at. Stop-hook violations jumped from zero to 10 per day. Turns out Anthropic quietly downgraded the default effort level from "high" to "medium" and introduced "adaptive thinking" that apparently isn't thinking hard enough. If you're using Claude for anything mission-critical, this is a wake-up call.

The model is literally making blind edits to files it never read, which means your 'AI pair programmer' might be randomly breaking working code

Reddit
How Google DeepMind is researching the next frontier of AI for Gemini — Raia Hadsell, VP of Research
ResearchRead

How Google DeepMind is researching the next frontier of AI for Gemini — Raia Hadsell, VP of Research

Google DeepMind's VP of Research Raia Hadsell discusses the cutting-edge research driving the next generation of Gemini AI. The article explores what's coming next for Google's flagship AI model and the research directions that will shape its future capabilities.

Reddit
Researchers crack Gemini's SynthID detection—here's what that means for AI-generated contentStock image
ResearchRead

Researchers crack Gemini's SynthID detection—here's what that means for AI-generated content

Google's Gemini has a built-in watermark called SynthID that's supposed to flag AI-generated images so you can tell them apart from real ones. Sounds good in theory, right? Well, researchers just figured out how to fool it. They found ways to strip out or manipulate the watermark, which basically means bad actors could now pass off AI images as real without getting caught. It's like Google put a lock on the door, but someone just found the master key. This matters because as AI image generation gets better and better, we're going to need reliable ways to spot fakes—especially with deepfakes and misinformation becoming a real problem. The fact that SynthID can be reverse-engineered this easily is a pretty big wake-up call for the whole industry.

Hacker News
97