Which AI reasoning model actually handles creative problem-solving best?
哪個 AI 推理模型在創意問題解決上表現最好?
I've been testing Codex 5.4, Claude Opus 4.6, and Gemini 3.1 Pro extensively, and here's the honest take: they're all decent at what they do, but they completely choke when you ask them to do something genuinely creative—like taking an idea from one field and applying it to another. Instead of actually thinking it through, they just default to safe, generic responses. What's wild is that Opus 4.6 used to be solid when it first came out, but now it's noticeably worse. When I run its output through GPT 5.4 or do code reviews, fundamental problems keep popping up. Curious what your experience has been—which one actually delivers when you need real reasoning, not just pattern matching?
OpenAI is hosting a livestream event. Details about the specific announcements, product launches, or demonstrations will be revealed during the broadcast.
The last time OpenAI did an unannounced livestream, they dropped GPT-4 Turbo and changed pricing overnight
OpinionsRead
ChatGPT Images 2.0
OpenAI is launching ChatGPT Images 2.0 with major upgrades to image generation capabilities. Watch the livestream announcement at https://openai.com/live/
OpenAI is positioning this as a direct competitor to established image generation tools, suggesting they're confident enough to challenge the current market leaders
OpinionsRead
The "just wait 6 months" argument from 2025 survived exactly one iteration
Throughout 2025 the standard response to any complaint about an LLM was some version of "just wait 3-6 months, the next generation will handle this effortlessly." The argument was everywhere. Every limitation was temporary, every missing capability was a few iterations away, every autonomous agent demo was a preview of imminent reality.
It's April 2026 now and worth checking how that held up.
On r/ClaudeAI this week there's a long thread about Opus 4.7 where multiple users argue it's a regress
OpinionsRead
Mistral Medium 3.5 on AMD Strix Halo: Painfully Slow (Plan for Overnight Runs)
Someone actually tested Mistral Medium 3.5 on AMD's new Strix Halo chip, and the results are... not great. For a 48k-token prompt with 4k thinking tokens, it took about 2 hours just to get an answer about code architecture. Yeah, you read that right—two hours. The takeaway: if you want to run this locally on Strix Halo, queue it up before bed. The technical setup involved heavy optimization (Q5_K_XL quantization, GPU acceleration with -ngl 999, cache reuse), but even with all that tuning, it's still a crawl. Not exactly the "instant local AI" dream, but hey, at least it works.