Pull down to go back
Confused About Wildly Polarizing ICML Reviews—Will the AC Even Care?

Confused About Wildly Polarizing ICML Reviews—Will the AC Even Care?

ICML 審查意見超兩極化,我的論文到底過不過得了?

Just finished rebuttals and got some wild swings in my scores. Started with 5(4), 4(4), 4(3), 2(4)—pretty messy already. After rebuttals: 5(4), 5(4), 5(3), 2(5). So now I'm at 4.25 average with confidence at 4. The two reviewers who gave 4s both bumped to 5s with solid justifications, but that one stubborn 2 went UP to a 5 in confidence while staying at 2. Has anyone dealt with this kind of split decision? Is this actually borderline, or does it all come down to whether the AC is having a good day?

Keywords

paper reviewpolarizing scoresrebuttalconference submissionreviewer disagreement