Will I make it into ICML 2026? My paper just got weak rejects but reviewers hinted they'd raise scores
我的論文能進 ICML 2026 嗎?弱拒審查員暗示加改就會提分
A researcher transitioning from theoretical physics to machine learning shares their ICML 2026 submission journey. After the review period, their paper improved from 4333 to 4433 scores. Two weak reject reviewers indicated they'd likely raise their scores if specific changes were made: one wants a parameter sweep and a small section added (which the author already did), and the other needs their questions properly addressed. The paper focuses on deep learning theory. The author estimates a realistic chance of reaching 4443, with a 30-40% shot at the coveted 4444 (accept). They're cautiously optimistic but clearly anxious about whether these revisions will be enough to push them over the line for acceptance.
OpenAI is hosting a livestream event. Details about the specific announcements, product launches, or demonstrations will be revealed during the broadcast.
The last time OpenAI did an unannounced livestream, they dropped GPT-4 Turbo and changed pricing overnight
OpinionsRead
ChatGPT Images 2.0
OpenAI is launching ChatGPT Images 2.0 with major upgrades to image generation capabilities. Watch the livestream announcement at https://openai.com/live/
OpenAI is positioning this as a direct competitor to established image generation tools, suggesting they're confident enough to challenge the current market leaders
OpinionsRead
The "just wait 6 months" argument from 2025 survived exactly one iteration
Throughout 2025 the standard response to any complaint about an LLM was some version of "just wait 3-6 months, the next generation will handle this effortlessly." The argument was everywhere. Every limitation was temporary, every missing capability was a few iterations away, every autonomous agent demo was a preview of imminent reality.
It's April 2026 now and worth checking how that held up.
On r/ClaudeAI this week there's a long thread about Opus 4.7 where multiple users argue it's a regress
OpinionsRead
Mistral Medium 3.5 on AMD Strix Halo: Painfully Slow (Plan for Overnight Runs)
Someone actually tested Mistral Medium 3.5 on AMD's new Strix Halo chip, and the results are... not great. For a 48k-token prompt with 4k thinking tokens, it took about 2 hours just to get an answer about code architecture. Yeah, you read that right—two hours. The takeaway: if you want to run this locally on Strix Halo, queue it up before bed. The technical setup involved heavy optimization (Q5_K_XL quantization, GPU acceleration with -ngl 999, cache reuse), but even with all that tuning, it's still a crawl. Not exactly the "instant local AI" dream, but hey, at least it works.