往下拉回到首頁
你用ChatGPT問律師的事,法官說可以當證據用?同一天兩個法官判完全相反,CEO的刪除訊息被挖出來直接在法庭上轟他

你用ChatGPT問律師的事,法官說可以當證據用?同一天兩個法官判完全相反,CEO的刪除訊息被挖出來直接在法庭上轟他

A federal judge ruled AI chats have no attorney-client privilege. A CEO's deleted ChatGPT conversations were recovered and used against him in court. On the same day, a different judge ruled the opposite.

A federal judge ruled that your AI conversations can be seized and used against you in court — and deleting them doesn't help. **The Heppner case (February 2026):** - Former CEO Bradley Heppner used Claude to prep his fraud defense - Judge Jed Rakoff ordered him to surrender 31 AI-generated documents - Ruling: no attorney-client privilege exists "or could exist" between a user and an AI platform **The Krafton case:** - A CEO used ChatGPT to plan how to avoid paying promised earnout payment